Daily Archives: August 5th, 2008

(Edge Philadelphia)

This little rumor might make me tune in…

Lance Bass to Gay It Up on ’Dancing with the Stars’?

Openly gay former boy band icon Lance Bass could Tango his way into homosexual history becoming the first celebrity to dance his way up the Dancing with the Stars’ ladder-with another man.

Although the Dancing with the Stars season seven line-up has yet to be revealed, rumors are circulating that Bass, the former ’N Sync member who came out of the closet two summers ago, could join the cast.

But Bass wouldn’t be the first ’N Sync member to lace up his dancing shoes and Cha Cha his way into America’s hearts. Bass’ former boy band co-member Joey Fatone finished in second place on Dancing with the Stars’ season four.

The show pairs celebrities with dancing professionals and the word is out that Bass, if he joins the cast, would be paired with a male dance pro, reported The New York Daily News.

It would be the first time a same-sex couple danced together on that stage and Bass could be the one to cross that threshold and open the door to a male couple tearing up the dance floor together.

The show’s network ABC has yet to comment on the Bass boy on boy buzz.

(Washington Blade) Nancy Pelosi announced this week that she’s pushing for Rep. Chet Edwards of Texas to be Obama’s running mate.

Pelosi, who could be called one of the gay community’s biggest political allies, has a 100% rating from the Human Rights Campaign and has spoken at numerous events thrown by the organization. She has an entirely pro-gay rights voting record under her belt.

The Dallas Voice points out today, however, that the man she wants Obama to pick for his VP is decidedly anti-gay.

“Edwards scored a 15 out of 100 on the Human Rights Campaign’s most recent Congressional scorecard, putting him in a three-way tie for least gay-friendly among 11 Democratic House members from Texas. Among other things, Edwards, a Southern Baptist, supported the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2006,” the story said.

(FirstShowing)

…there is actually a Smurfs movie now officially in the works at Sony. J. David Stem and David Weiss, who wrote the last two Shrek films, are in negotiations to write the screenplay. Producer Jordan Kerner actually secured the rights in 2002 and has been developing it at Paramount, however Sony has separately decided to get it into production as a hybrid live-action feature. I wonder if that post earlier this year had anything to do with it?

This will mark Sony Pictures Animation’s first hybrid film, which is a live-action blend of CGI characters and real actors, as was seen with Alvin and the Chipmunks last year. Given the success of that film (an enormous $217 million at the box office), Sony decided that there was definite potential to turn the Smurfs into a similar kind of family film. “The Smurfs are one of the best-known franchises, and among the most beloved collection of characters in the world,” Columbia co-president Doug Belgrad said. “We’re very excited to introduce a new generation to Papa Smurf, Smurfette and the other smurftastic Smurfs in all of their ‘three-apple-tall’ glory.”

I can’t f*cking wait…

and if that wasn’t enough “totally awesome 80s”:


(Hollywood.com)

Who You Gonna Call? Harold Ramis…for Ghostbusters III

Moviemaker Harold Ramis is trying to bring his Ghostbusters movie franchise
back to the big screen–and he wants Ben Stiller to star in a third film.

Ramis reveals Ghostbusters star Dan Aykroyd has written a new script, called Ghostbusters in Hell, and Ramis is keen to get the project started.

He tells InFocus magazine he wants Stiller to join Aykroyd and Rick Moranis in the sequel.

Aykroyd’s script transports the bumbling ghostbusters into a parallel dimension via a portal in a New York warehouse.

Ramis explains, “What Danny had originally conceived was sending us to a special-effects hell–a netherworld full of phenomenal visual environments and boiling pits.

“But what works so well about the first two (films) is the mundane-ness of it all. So my notion was that hell exists in the same place as our consensus reality, but it’s like a film shutter–it’s the darkness between the 24 frames.

“So we create a device to do it, and it’s in a warehouse in Brooklyn. When we step out of the chamber, it looks just like New York, but it’s hell–everything’s grid locked; no cars are moving and all the drivers are swearing at each other in different foreign languages. No two people speak the same language. It’s all the worst things about modern urban life, just magnified.”

(from the Huffington Post)

Lindsay Lohan said Friday that police have no business getting involved in her personal life, a day after the police chief explained that the paparazzi were no longer an issue _ in part because the 22-year-old actress had evidently “gone gay.”

“Police chief shouldn’t get involved in everyone else’s business when it comes to their personal life. It’s inappropriate,” Lohan said in a video shot by paparazzi Friday and posted on TMZ.com. In the footage, Lohan and gal pal Samantha Ronson are trekking through the Los Angeles Airport on their way to catch a flight to Chicago.

The day before, Chief William Bratton said the paparazzi have become less of a problem thanks to Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and Lohan leading more moderate lifestyles.

“If you notice, since Britney started wearing clothes and behaving; Paris is out of town not bothering anybody anymore, thank God, and evidently, Lindsay Lohan has gone gay, we don’t seem to have much of an issue,” he told KNBC-TV…

Bratton later called a news conference outside police headquarters to clarify his position on the paparazzi. When asked about the Lohan remark _ which followed months of tabloid speculation that Lohan and Ronson, a DJ, are dating _ Bratton said his sister is gay and he is a proponent of gay rights.

(LA Times) We have reporters, columnists and TV talking heads to thank for exposing these outrageous displays. So apparently the verdict is in: Sen. Barack Obama, too confident to govern.

It all would be quite funny if many people didn’t seem to be inhaling this multimedia stink bomb as if it were fragrant truth.

I’ve spent a few days on the campaign trail with Obama and know people who’ve traveled with him for months. I wouldn’t argue that portrayals of the candidate as occasionally aloof, or a little professorial, are imagined.

But it’s a long ways from, in the words of Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank, acting like “the presumptuous nominee” whose “biggest challenger may not be Republican John McCain but rather his own hubris.” Milbank, who is often wickedly revealing, last week seemed mostly wicked as he turned benign campaign tableau — an Obama motorcade, a talk with the Treasury secretary, a “pep rally” with congressional Democrats — into evidence that Obama thinks he’s already the winner.

Milbank at least leavened his thesis with humor, unlike others piling on the campaign to turn Barack into Slick Barry.

Fox News host Sean Hannity told viewers last week how “presumptuous” Obama had become. Proof: The candidate told congressional Democrats that the world had been waiting for his hopeful message and that to some he had become a symbol of a “return to our best traditions.” That may not be humble pie, but doesn’t even come close to breaking the narcissism barrier. Don’t our politicians routinely boast about how essential they are to the republic?

Then came the stunning revelation that Obama had begun planning for a transition to the White House.

Fox News hostess E.D. Hill — who dubbed Obama’s playful knuckle bump with his wife a “terrorist fist jab” — reminded viewers recently that the Democrat was “not commander in chief just yet, which is why some find his decision to start planning his transition into the White House a bit presumptuous.”

Hill wondered whether Obama was “jumping the gun or just covering all the bases?”

Never mind that McCain advisors have acknowledged that they too were planning for a White House transition or the fact that history has rewarded those who looked ahead. Early transition planner Ronald Reagan hit the ground running in 1980. Bill Clinton initially struggled after dawdling on White House preparations in 1992.

Yeah, but what about that talk of remodeling the Lincoln Bedroom? Surely that proves Obama thinks he’s destined for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

That whopper grew out of an entirely benign moment last month in Fargo, N.D. A woman asked if Obama would consider remodeling the room with African kente cloth.

“No,” Obama said with a laugh. He mused that when he had toured the White House in 2005, he thought a copy of the Gettysburg Address would look more appropriate in the historic chamber than the flat-screen TV on the wall.

What about that seal, complete with American eagle, that the Obama faithful trotted out a few weeks back? No question it was a cheesy would-be stature-builder — but it was far short of counting electoral votes before they’re cast.

The candidate’s crowning demonstrations of hubris, according to those building a case, came during his extended trip to Iraq, Afghanistan, the Middle East and Europe. Recall the pundits demanding the freshman Illinois senator prove he could be presidential in the foreign arena?

So he appeared at ease with world leaders, talked animatedly with beaming American troops and drew huge civilian crowds. Then the pundits — who had been taking a round of bashing for supposedly going easy on Obama — told Obama he needed to beware of appearing too presidential. (continue reading)